Consistent With Is Not Evidence For
A methodological critique of a geochemical study claiming ancient geopolymer concrete manufacture at Cusco, Peru. The paper examines whether geochemical anomalies, radiometric dates, and morphological observations constitute evidence in the scientifically meaningful sense — or merely consistency with a hypothesis.
↗ View on publisher site · doi:10.5281/zenodo.20830077↓ Download paper (DOCX · Free)
Part of the DSSM corpus — 97 open-access papers spanning cognitive archaeology, symbolic systems theory, and civilizational analysis.
Full framework, timelines, and field protocol at dssm.academy
Full framework, timelines, and field protocol at dssm.academy